BackWPup vs WPvivid Benchmark Comparison
Backup Scope
| Component | BackWPup | WPvivid |
|---|---|---|
| Database | ||
| Plugins | ||
| Themes | ||
| Uploads | ||
| WordPress Core | ||
| wp-config.php |
Plugins that back up less data may appear faster but provide less protection.
Analysis
Written from this matchup's measurements. No editorial figures.
BackWPup vs WPvivid: the record
Across 5 recorded battles, BackWPup leads 5 to 0. It has taken every decided run in this matchup, which is a consistent result rather than a close one. Elo currently has them at 1263 (BackWPup) against 715 (WPvivid).
Backup and restore speed
Backing up, BackWPup averages 3.4s against 14.2s for WPvivid. Restoring, it is 13.4s against 16.7s. BackWPup is ahead on both phases, by 76% on backup and 20% on restore. A plugin that leads both is a simpler recommendation than one trading a fast backup for a slow recovery.
What each one actually backs up
Both plugins archive the same set of content, so the timings below compare like with like. Where that is not true, this section says so.
Archive format and size
BackWPup writes a tar archive, averaging 164 MB. WPvivid writes a ZIP archive, deflating each entry as it goes, averaging 61 MB. That leaves WPvivid about 104 MB smaller per backup, which compounds against every copy you retain. The gap is mostly the format rather than the engineering: compressing costs CPU on the way in and returns little on media that is already compressed, so the plugin that skips it finishes sooner and stores more. Neither choice is wrong, but they optimise for different bills.
Which should you choose?
If your backup window is the constraint, BackWPup finishes first; if you are paying for retention, WPvivid writes less per copy. Every figure above links to the run that produced it, including the logs, so none of this has to be taken on trust.
Common questions
- Which is faster, BackWPup or WPvivid?
- On the runs recorded so far, BackWPup backs up faster, averaging 3.4s against 14.2s. The same plugin is also quicker to restore. Speed alone does not settle it, because the two plugins do not always archive the same content.
- How big are the backups?
- BackWPup averages 164 MB per backup and WPvivid averages 61 MB, measured on the same site profiles. Multiply by however many copies you keep before deciding the difference is academic.
- How does Backup Arena measure this?
- Both plugins run inside identical Docker containers against the same WordPress snapshot, on six hosting profiles ranging from constrained shared hosting to a dedicated box. Each configuration runs a discarded warm-up followed by three measured iterations, and the site is reset to a verified snapshot between every run. A backup that will not restore is a loss regardless of how quickly it was written.
- How much should I trust these numbers?
- This matchup has 5 recorded battles, which is enough to be indicative and not enough to be final. Every run is published with its logs so you can check the workings, and reruns can be requested.
Stats
By Site Profile
Looking for the arena's top-ranked option? See how SafeGuard compares.