BackupBuddy vs BackWPup Benchmark Comparison

Arena/Leaderboard/BackupBuddy vs BackWPup
Head-to-Head · 5 Battles
BackupBuddy logo

BackupBuddy

491+/- 32048 total battles
VS
BackWPup logo

BackWPup

1263+/- 11348 total battles

Backup Scope

ComponentBackupBuddyBackWPup
Database
Plugins
Themes
Uploads
WordPress Core
wp-config.php

Plugins that back up less data may appear faster but provide less protection.

Analysis

Written from this matchup's measurements. No editorial figures.

BackupBuddy vs BackWPup: the record

Across 5 recorded battles, BackWPup leads 5 to 0. It has taken every decided run in this matchup, which is a consistent result rather than a close one. Elo currently has them at 491 (BackupBuddy) against 1263 (BackWPup).

Backup and restore speed

Backing up, BackupBuddy averages 5.9s against 1.8s for BackWPup. Restoring, it is 43.8s against 8.3s. BackWPup is ahead on both phases, by 69% on backup and 81% on restore. A plugin that leads both is a simpler recommendation than one trading a fast backup for a slow recovery.

What each one actually backs up

Both plugins archive the same set of content, so the timings below compare like with like. Where that is not true, this section says so.

Archive format and size

BackupBuddy writes a ZIP archive, deflating each entry as it goes, averaging 53 MB. BackWPup writes a tar archive, averaging 110 MB. That leaves BackupBuddy about 57 MB smaller per backup, which compounds against every copy you retain. The gap is mostly the format rather than the engineering: compressing costs CPU on the way in and returns little on media that is already compressed, so the plugin that skips it finishes sooner and stores more. Neither choice is wrong, but they optimise for different bills.

Which should you choose?

If your backup window is the constraint, BackWPup finishes first; if you are paying for retention, BackupBuddy writes less per copy. Every figure above links to the run that produced it, including the logs, so none of this has to be taken on trust.

Common questions

Which is faster, BackupBuddy or BackWPup?
On the runs recorded so far, BackWPup backs up faster, averaging 1.8s against 5.9s. The same plugin is also quicker to restore. Speed alone does not settle it, because the two plugins do not always archive the same content.
How big are the backups?
BackupBuddy averages 53 MB per backup and BackWPup averages 110 MB, measured on the same site profiles. Multiply by however many copies you keep before deciding the difference is academic.
How does Backup Arena measure this?
Both plugins run inside identical Docker containers against the same WordPress snapshot, on six hosting profiles ranging from constrained shared hosting to a dedicated box. Each configuration runs a discarded warm-up followed by three measured iterations, and the site is reset to a verified snapshot between every run. A backup that will not restore is a loss regardless of how quickly it was written.
How much should I trust these numbers?
This matchup has 5 recorded battles, which is enough to be indicative and not enough to be final. Every run is published with its logs so you can check the workings, and reruns can be requested.

Stats

0wins
0draws
wins5
BackupBuddyBackWPup
BackupBuddyLower is betterBackWPup
5.9sAvg Backup1.8s
43.8sAvg Restore8.3s

By Site Profile

Blog Starter (XS)1 battleBackWPup wins 1-0
0wins
0draws
wins1
BackupBuddyBackWPup
5.3sBackup1.7s
39.4sRestore8.5s
Business Site (S)1 battleBackWPup wins 1-0
0wins
0draws
wins1
BackupBuddyBackWPup
0.0sBackup0.0s
0.0sRestore0.0s
Developer Portfolio (S)1 battleBackWPup wins 1-0
0wins
0draws
wins1
BackupBuddyBackWPup
6.5sBackup2.0s
48.2sRestore8.0s
News/Magazine (M)1 battleBackWPup wins 1-0
0wins
0draws
wins1
BackupBuddyBackWPup
0.0sBackup0.0s
0.0sRestore0.0s
WooCommerce Standard (M)1 battleBackWPup wins 1-0
0wins
0draws
wins1
BackupBuddyBackWPup
0.0sBackup0.0s
0.0sRestore0.0s

Looking for the arena's top-ranked option? See how SafeGuard compares.